Loading Vietnam UD1 Visa guidance…

This guide is part of the VIFC talent and residency pathway, which explains the dual-hub framework, legal instruments, work authorization, tax and family routes.

Financial-centre comparison

VIFC vs DIFC vs Singapore for senior professionals

A decision framework for executives, founders, investors, HR leaders and mobility teams that distinguishes confirmed VIFC provisions from facts requiring jurisdiction-specific verification.

Last verified: September 8, 2026Independent publisher

Direct answer

VIFC may merit consideration when a role or investment can connect to a VIFC member and its confirmed work, residence, tax or ownership framework matters. DIFC and Singapore cannot be ranked from the supplied evidence. Compare the actual entity, regulated activity, role, family needs and implementation certainty—not centre names alone.

This is general information, not legal or tax advice. Regulations at the VIFC are new and evolving — confirm current requirements with a licensed professional.

Start with the decision, not the destination

A senior-professional comparison should begin with the transaction or career decision that must work in practice. Define whether the project is a regulated financial business, regional headquarters, investment vehicle, member-organisation role, founder relocation, specialist assignment or family move. Then identify the employing, investing and operating entities.

Use five gates. First, test institutional fit: eligible entity, activity, licence and regulator. Second, test personal fit: role, employment relationship, expertise classification and investment position. Third, test economic fit: qualifying income, ownership, payroll, costs and the time boundary of any incentive. Fourth, test mobility fit: work authorisation, principal residence, family residence and status-change consequences. Fifth, test execution fit: authority, forms, evidence, filing channel, timing, renewals and enforcement.

The evidence supports VIFC analysis but not equivalent DIFC or Singapore conclusions. Use a shortlist with confirmed facts, questions and owners. Treat issues preventing licensing, employment, payroll, residence or family relocation as conditions precedent.

Side-by-side comparison

This table does not fill evidence gaps with reputation or general knowledge. VIFC entries use only confirmed facts from the supplied source files. DIFC and Singapore entries remain verification tasks. “Up to 10 years” is a maximum, not a promised term, and no VIFC benefit is automatic.

Confirmed VIFC position and verification requirements for DIFC and Singapore
Decision factorVIFC — confirmed positionDIFC — source statusSingapore — source status
Structure and locationOne legal entity operating through Ho Chi Minh City and Da Nang hubs; a separate regulatory zone inside Vietnam applying international financial standards alongside Vietnam’s existing legal system.See open questions below.See open questions below.
Institutional frameworkA specialised one-stop Executive Agency exists, and a specialised VIFC court is located in Ho Chi Minh City. Complete mandates and procedures are not confirmed.See open questions below.See open questions below.
Reporting standardsIFRS or accepted international reporting may be used; entity-specific scope and implementation require confirmation.See open questions below.See open questions below.
Foreign staffingThere is no foreign-worker cap, but every individual still requires the applicable eligibility and authorisation route.See open questions below.See open questions below.
Work authorisationEligible foreigners working for VIFC member organisations may receive permits or exemptions and work authorisation for up to 10 years. High-level foreign experts may qualify for an Executive Agency exemption.See open questions below.See open questions below.
Principal residenceEligible applicants may receive UD1 temporary residence cards for up to 10 years. Eligible foreigners may qualify for permanent residence, but no automatic conversion is confirmed.See open questions below.See open questions below.
Family positionA spouse and children under 18 may receive UD2 cards for the same duration as the principal’s UD1 card. Residence does not itself establish family work rights.See open questions below.See open questions below.
Personal taxUnder Decree No. 324/2025/ND-CP, qualifying managers, experts, scientists and individuals with high professional qualifications working at the International Financial Center are exempt from personal income tax on salary and wage income earned from work at the International Financial Center until the end of 2030.See open questions below.See open questions below.
Foreign ownershipA foreign investor may own 100% of the charter capital of an economic organisation that is a VIFC member. Membership, activity and licensing remain threshold issues.See open questions below.See open questions below.
Costs and timingNo verified figures or service standards are supplied for this comparison.See open questions below.See open questions below.
Market benchmarkHo Chi Minh City ranked 84th of 120 in GFCI 39 in 2026, up 11 places year on year, third in ASEAN behind Singapore and Kuala Lumpur, and among 15 centres expected to expand global influence over the next 2–3 years.See open questions below.Singapore is ahead of Ho Chi Minh City in the supplied ASEAN ranking context.

What is confirmed about VIFC

Resolution No. 222/2025/QH15 established the Vietnam International Financial Centre. It was passed on 27 June 2025 and became effective on 1 September 2025. Decree No. 323/2025/ND-CP, dated 18 December 2025, formalised the legal foundation. Decree No. 324/2025/ND-CP covers tax. Decree No. 325/2025/ND-CP governs labour, employment and social security inside the IFC (incl. the work-permit exemption route); Decree No. 327/2025/ND-CP governs entry, exit and residence of foreign nationals working for VIFC members; the reviewed materials do not allocate every operational rule between those two instruments.

VIFC is one legal entity with two hubs. Da Nang inaugurated its hub on 9 January 2026, and Ho Chi Minh City launched its hub on 11 February 2026. The framework sits inside Vietnam rather than replacing Vietnam’s existing legal system. IFRS or accepted international reporting may be used. The institutional structure includes the one-stop Executive Agency and the specialised VIFC court in Ho Chi Minh City, although their full procedures and hub-level responsibilities remain open.

Eligible foreigners working for VIFC member organisations may receive permits or exemptions and work authorisation for up to 10 years. High-level foreign experts may qualify for a work-permit exemption under Executive Agency criteria. Decree No. 325/2025/ND-CP expressly excludes accompanying family members from the Article 5(1) work-permit-exemption category; family residence and any separate work route must be assessed independently. There is no foreign-worker cap, yet each person still requires individual eligibility and authorisation.

Eligible applicants may receive UD1 temporary residence cards for up to 10 years. A spouse and children under 18 may receive UD2 cards for the same duration as the principal’s UD1 card. Eligible foreigners may qualify for permanent residence, but the sources do not confirm automatic eligibility or a conversion period. Work permission, temporary residence, family residence and permanent residence must be assessed separately.

Decree No. 324/2025/ND-CP was issued on 18 December 2025 and took effect on 17 January 2026. Its confirmed personal income tax measure applies to qualifying managers, experts, scientists and individuals with high professional qualifications working at the International Financial Center and covers salary and wage income earned from work at the International Financial Center until the end of 2030. Separately, foreign investors may own 100% of the charter capital of an economic organisation that is a VIFC member.

Use the benchmark as context, not a legal conclusion

The permitted benchmark evidence concerns Ho Chi Minh City, not a complete legal or commercial comparison of VIFC, DIFC and Singapore. In GFCI 39 in 2026, Ho Chi Minh City ranked 84th among 120 centres and rose 11 places year on year. It ranked third in ASEAN behind Singapore and Kuala Lumpur and was among 15 centres expected to expand global influence over the next two to three years. VIFC’s CEO is Rich McClellan.

These facts may inform questions about trajectory and institutional development, but they do not prove licence availability, regulatory equivalence, market depth, operating cost, hiring ease, tax outcome or immigration success. Singapore’s position ahead of Ho Chi Minh City in the supplied ASEAN context also does not establish the best jurisdiction for a particular entity or person.

Unknowns that must remain visible

No DIFC legal, tax, visa, residence, ownership, cost, processing-time or licensing facts are verified within the supplied source boundary.

No Singapore legal, tax, visa, residence, ownership, cost, processing-time or licensing facts are verified within the supplied source boundary.

Important VIFC implementation questions also remain.

Selection checklist for an executive or investment committee

  • Define the decision in one sentence: entity formation, regulated operation, employment, investment, relocation or a combined programme.
  • Identify the exact employing, investing and operating entities; do not rely on a group brand or city address.
  • Confirm whether the proposed VIFC entity is or can become a member and whether its activity is permitted and licensed.
  • Map the candidate’s role, duties, work location, contractual relationship and evidence to the relevant permit or exemption route.
  • Model work authorisation and UD1 residence independently; treat 10 years as a maximum, not the default.
  • List each accompanying spouse and child under 18, map the UD2 linkage and separately assess any intended family employment.
  • Test the Decree No. 324/2025/ND-CP exemption by person, employer, income type, centre connection and end-2030 boundary.
  • Compare jurisdictions only after DIFC and Singapore counsel use the same scenario, headings and cut-off date.
  • Convert verified costs to USD, record exchange-rate dates and separate official charges, adviser fees, premises, payroll and recurring compliance.
  • Record responsible owners, evidence, unresolved conditions and the events that would trigger reassessment.
  • Require written confirmation for every issue capable of blocking licensing, work, residence, payroll or family relocation before final approval.

Open questions

What is not yet settled

These points require confirmation against current guidance and the facts of an individual case

  • Not yet confirmed: legal structure, territorial scope, applicable legal system and relationship to wider UAE law.
  • Not yet confirmed: relevant financial-centre, regulatory and legal framework for the proposed Singapore activity.
  • Not yet confirmed: regulator, licensing authority, court jurisdiction, procedure, appeals and enforcement.
  • Not yet confirmed: permitted or required reporting framework, audit duties and entity-specific application.
  • Not yet confirmed: foreign-worker limits, employer duties, labour approvals and individual eligibility.
  • Not yet confirmed: work-authorisation categories, sponsor, eligibility, duration, renewal, cancellation, fees and timing.
  • Not yet confirmed: residence categories, eligibility, duration, permanent-status route, fees and procedures.
  • Not yet confirmed: eligible dependants, duration, work rights, age limits, evidence, fees and status-change effects.
  • Not yet confirmed: personal tax rates, residence tests, qualifying income, reliefs, filing and effective dates.
  • Not yet confirmed: ownership limits, entity types, regulated activities, capital and continuing obligations.
  • Not yet confirmed: official and recurring entity, licensing, office, employment, visa, residence and compliance costs in USD, plus timelines.
  • Not yet confirmed: a current comparable ranking and methodology before using a DIFC benchmark.
  • Not yet confirmed: singapore’s exact rank, score, trend and methodology before making a broader claim.
  • Not yet confirmed: current primary instruments, regulator publications, entity and activity rules, ownership and capital requirements, tax treatment, employment and immigration routes, dependant treatment, court framework, official fees and recurring costs. Do not convert familiarity with Dubai or the UAE into a DIFC-specific conclusion.
  • Not yet confirmed: relevant statutes, regulator publications, entity and activity rules, ownership and capital requirements, tax treatment, employment and immigration routes, dependant treatment, dispute framework, official fees and recurring costs. The only permitted comparative benchmark is that Ho Chi Minh City ranked third in ASEAN behind Singapore and Kuala Lumpur in the supplied GFCI 39 context.
  • Not yet confirmed: membership criteria; activity and licensing rules; Executive Agency expert criteria; allocation between Decree No. 325/2025/ND-CP and Decree No. 327/2025/ND-CP; forms, authorities, channels, fees, timing, renewals and cancellation; tax definitions; UD1, UD2 and permanent-residence procedures; family work authorisation; court jurisdiction; and hub-specific responsibilities.
  • Not yet confirmed: official incorporation, licensing, office, employment, work-authorisation, residence and renewal charges; adviser and translation fees; recurring compliance and audit costs; processing times; refundability; and all DIFC and Singapore equivalents. Present only verified figures in USD, with the exchange-rate date and assumptions. No comparative cost figures are confirmed in the supplied sources.

Questions senior candidates ask

VIFC pathway FAQ

Is VIFC better than DIFC or Singapore?

The supplied evidence does not support a universal ranking. VIFC has confirmed centre-specific work, residence, tax and ownership provisions, but their eligibility and implementation must be tested.

What is the strongest confirmed VIFC proposition for a senior professional?

Eligible foreigners working for VIFC member organisations may receive work authorisation and a UD1 temporary residence card for up to 10 years, subject to separate eligibility and guidance. Article 7(2)(a) of Decree No. 324/2025/ND-CP covers salary and wage income earned from work at the International Financial Center for qualifying managers, experts, scientists and individuals with high professional qualifications through the end of 2030. Article 7(2)(b) separately addresses certain transfers to IFC members.

Does a VIFC role guarantee 10 years of work and residence?

No. The confirmed wording is “up to 10 years” for eligible work authorisation and an eligible UD1 card. The actual term, evidence, sequence and validity dependencies require confirmation. Approval in one category does not prove the same period or eligibility in another.

Can a senior professional move family members to VIFC?

A qualifying principal’s spouse and children under 18 may receive UD2 residence cards for the same duration as the principal’s UD1 card. That residence linkage does not itself establish permission to work.

How should the GFCI ranking affect the decision?

Treat it as directional context only. Ho Chi Minh City ranked 84th of 120 in GFCI 39 in 2026, rose 11 places year on year, ranked third in ASEAN behind Singapore and Kuala Lumpur, and was among 15 centres expected to expand global influence over the next two to three years. Rankings do not resolve legal fit.

What must be verified before comparing costs?

Verify the legal and operational assumptions before comparing costs: incorporation, licensing, office, employment, work-authorisation, residence and renewal charges; adviser and translation fees; recurring compliance and audit costs; processing times; refundability; and the relevant DIFC and Singapore equivalents. No comparative cost figures are confirmed in the supplied sources.